Page 389 - 2019 6th AFIS & ASMMA
P. 389

» Panelist  |  Tyler T. Yang
                 Yes, I think for pricing purpose, breakeven should be the right
               concept. But, it was great point to raise the question. Given the payoff is
               the asymmetric to the house price appreciation, they're just taking the
               expected house price to draw your breakeven rate, which can be biased.
               Since we took over the HECM actuarial review, we actually use the
               Monte Carlo simulation to find out the break-even point, by calculating
               expected losses as per different potential house price appreciation rate.




               » Moderator  |  Richard K. Green
                 But even so, there still may be a tail of losses in the extreme cap. So
               at what extent do you want to limit that extreme tail, or do you want to
               limit it?                                                             Session III




               » Panelist  |  Tyler T. Yang
                 Yeah, if we are dealing this with a private market, to get a Triple A
               rating, we need to have 99.5 percent risk bar. But for the government,
               which has social responsibilities, we expand that to 5 percent and 10
               percent far, which will basically be 90 to 95 percent confidence. That will
               become their capital requirement.




               » Moderator  |  Richard K. Green
                 Okay, thanks. Let's move on to our discussants. First, we're going to
               have In Seong Hwang from our host organization for this conference. Say
               a few words?
 » Moderator  |  Richard K. Green
 Okay, thank you, Tyler. So, let me ask you one question before we
 move on to our discussants. Do you think breakeven is the right aim   » Panelist  |  In Seong Hwang
 or should we mind tail risk? Whether you subsidize or not, given the   Head of Housing Finance Research Institute, Korea Housing Finance Corporation
 expected return, there's a 50% or more chances where everything's going
 to be fine. But, there is also a chance that the size of the losses expands   Yes, it's a very nice and intuitive session, so I am very glad to
 substantially when something goes badly wrong, which would be of   participate in the discussion and talk about our product. Okay, I
 interest particularly with regards to taxpayer supporting programs.   prepared some slides, so let me start.




 390           2019 6th AFIS & ASMMA Annual Meeting                            391
   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394