Page 380 - 2019 6th AFIS & ASMMA
P. 380

Lastly, let's compare with the factors across time. Before the 2009,
            75-year-old borrower at seven percent interest rate environment can
            borrow 60 percent of the house value. That amount decreased to
            54.8percent immediately after the fund transfer to the MMI fund. So
            that reflects the requirement to be self-sustained and not to lose money
            or be subsidized. Then that factor keeps on dropping, and by today the
            factor is only about 40 percent. So within the last ten years, there was a
            20 points drop; it's a one-third decrease in the amount that the senior
            citizen can receive from this reverse loan. So the question I want to put
            here is whether this is desirable from the government's perspective.
            Should the program be taking care of the senior and try to make them to
            receive as much as they could on a fair basis? Or do we just need to make
            sure that we don't tap into taxpayer dollars and charge the borrower for
            those extra costs?                                                                                                                                              Session III



                                                                                                        When we try to derive the principal limit factor using the red line, it's
                                                                                                      based on the private lending required rate of return. A very important
                                                                                                      feature in the HECM program is that by the time the loan balance
                                                                                                      reached the original home value, the lender will assign the loan to FHA.
                                                                                                      So starting from that point going forward, basically the HECM has
                                                                                                      become a director lending. Once FHA purchases the loan out of the
                                                                                                      lender and keeps in FHA's portfolio, the government becomes the lender
                                                                                                      and it becomes a direct lending program. So we can just see before the
                                                                                                      green line, it's a guarantee program, and after the green line, it becomes
                                                                                                      direct lending. The difference is; what's the required rate of return for
                                                                                                      this program to work? We see before the green line, because it's a private
                                                                                                      lending, the lender needs a higher rate of return. After that, it's FHA
                                                                                                      lending, so they only need to earn the Treasury rate of return, as their
               Corresponding to that, the Congressional Budget Office, the US                         cost of capital. So that will put additional cushion to the potential risk
            Congress, did research and by the end of last year, they published four                   when the balance becomes more than your house value.
            different recommendations of how to change the HECM program. The
            first one is to convert the program into a direct lending. That's exactly
            what the audience asked in the second question earlier. So what's the
            thinking behind that?





       382                                                                                            2019 6th AFIS & ASMMA Annual Meeting                            383
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385